What Does a Conditional Knowledge Base Entail?
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper presents a logical approach to nonmonotonic reasoning based on the notion of a nonmonotonic consequence relation A condi tional knowledge base consisting of a set of conditional assertions of the type if then represents the explicit defeasible knowledge an agent has about the way the world generally behaves We look for a plausible de nition of the set of all conditional assertions entailed by a conditional knowledge base In a previous paper S Kraus and the authors de ned and studied preferential consequence relations They noticed that not all preferential relations could be considered as reasonable inference procedures This paper studies a more restricted class of consequence relations rational relations It is argued that any reasonable nonmono tonic inference procedure should de ne a rational relation It is shown that the rational relations are exactly those that may be represented by a ranked preferential model or by a non standard probabilistic model The rational closure of a conditional knowledge base is de ned and shown to provide an attractive answer to the question of the title Global prop erties of this closure operation are proved it is a cumulative operation It is also computationally tractable This paper assumes the underlying language is propositional
منابع مشابه
Complexity Results for Default Reasoning from Conditional Knowledge Bases
Conditional knowledge bases have been proposed as belief bases that include defeasible rules (also called defaults) of the form “ ! ”, which informally read as “generally, if then .” Such rules may have exceptions, which can be handled in different ways. A number of entailment semantics for conditional knowledge bases have been proposed in the literature. However, while the semantic properties ...
متن کاملDefault reasoning from conditional knowledge bases: Complexity and tractable cases
Conditional knowledge bases have been proposed as belief bases that include defeasible rules (also called defaults) of the form “ ! ”, which informally read as “generally, if then .” Such rules may have exceptions, which can be handled in different ways. A number of entailment semantics for conditional knowledge bases have been proposed in the literature. However, while the semantic properties ...
متن کاملOn natural deduction system for nonmonotonic reasoning
This paper is concerned with the problem of how to construct a natural deduction system for nonmonotonic reasoning. Three possible constructions are investigated, the ones which consists of (1) pure nonmonotonic inference rules; (2) nonmonotonic inference rules plus a nonmonotonic tautology base; or (3) nonmonotonic inference rules plus a nonmonotonic conditional assertion base. Based on a fram...
متن کاملChapter 3: Adventures with a Cosmoscope
To argue for scrutability theses, as I do in this chapter and the next, we first need a potential scrutability base. I will start with a reasonably generous base. Later (in chapters 6 and 7), I will consider whether it needs to be augmented and whether it can be narrowed down. In the Aufbau, Carnap’s main base was a phenomenal base, consisting just of logical expressions plus an expression for ...
متن کامل-
The development and evolution of any system–person, organization–nation depends on how the system succeeds to bridge the gap between what the system knows and what the system does (with the knowledge). We call this the gap between knowing and doing or the knowing-doing gap. If the system does not do what it knows, it will lose out in competition with other systems, its relative performance in...
متن کامل